Among the reading
public, it’s become fashionable to say "I no longer read fiction," as
none other than Philip Roth did last year in the Financial Times. Yet since when has this become a rallying cry of disgruntled
writers? Writers, mind you, not readers. Suddenly, writers are saying, "I
don't read fiction, either." And the fiction police are waiting in the
stacks (of fiction) with their billy-clubs to knock the offenders--or should
that be, the offended?--in the kneecaps.
You usually expect this
complaint from writers of non-fiction.
This attitude might
spring from the epiphenomenon of anonymous comment logs on every piece about so-called
dwindling returns of fiction. Maybe the backlash comes from the offended being
offended by all those who are writing novels, because it seems everyone is,
these days; everyone is also writing a memoir about their salad--or fast
food--days, writing it of course after they've learned so much in trying to
write their novels after pursuing their MFAs. So, if everyone hates fiction so
much, why are they all working on a
novel?
With another announcement of the death of the novel,
the success of e-readers and the proliferation of self-publishing, comes,
remarkably, more novels to consider, sure, sometimes possibly of lesser
quality, and thus more to complain about. But to me, the death of the novel seems
closer to the brink when everyone is
reading--and praising--the latest Krispy Kreme writers without a dissenting
word among them. (Sweden, are you reading? Stieg Larsson? Begs the question of how
a member of a certain academy had the gall to call out America’s literary
output). But is this any different than any other time? If all of the dozens of
novels published in the last year sucked, there'd be no hope, sure. But no doubt
more great novels await being written by un-tested novelists who also happen to
have memoirs stashed away they are thinking about dusting off.
I too, regularly burn
my candle at the altar for fiction, until I find a novel that blind-sides and alters
my outlook forever after. Because isn’t that the beauty of a novel, how it can
change your life? To me, the novel never ceased being the main game.
I find it hard to believe
that Roth would get nothing from A
Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet, Skippy
Dies, or The Flame Alphabet. It
seems that these days, readers of fiction are almost always just a step away
from giving up on fiction. But for someone who writes it? To make a blanket pronouncement
implying all fiction has become ceaselessly lame, has to make you wonder if
such an attitude--from one who realizes he might have to relinquish his
throne--might actually be indicative of a bounty.
Thanks for the thoughtful post. You mention being blind-sided by fiction occasionally. Care to make a list? You might contribute it to the new Facebook community, "Who says that serious literature is dead?" The idea is to explore the exact question you're asking here.
ReplyDelete